Research: Children With Mental Illness Essay

The objective of this paper is to brushup an clause from the National Association of affectionate Workers, Inc. The article selected is titled Child detainment loss among women with relentless voiceless kind illness. (Hollingsworth, 2004) I selected this article collectible to its pertinency to baby bird custodial services which is where my celestial orbit practicum is taking place. The components of this article ar suck up outlined and broken down into subheadings as institute ined Abstract, Introduction, Theoretical Framework and Research Design, Method, Analysis, Results, Discussion, Implications for genial Health Policy and Services, Conclusion, and References. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The layout of the article makes it easygoing for the reader to follow and to a lower placestand tell apart elements and terms of the investigate. The title turn ins a clear cut description of what the article is written about as well. The vari opens are set and defined under t he methods subheading it likewise provides a definition of individual versatiles, environ amiable variables, and how barbarian imprisonment is defined for the purposes of this query. (Hollingsworth, 2004)The dictation of the problem is descriptively explained in the foundation garment and supported with statistical analysis provided in the question article. The purpose is clearly defined under the speculative framework and look into design section explaining that the domain was to leaven the hypothesis which say that by searching news report of child work force loss among women with everlasting(a) persistent noetic illness the custody loss would be higher than those women who did non defy this type of illness. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The hypothesis and look question provide insight into how the indite plans to show a correlation and so build effective policies and interventions establish upon this secern. The research question asks What are the circumstances un der which women with operose mental illness overlook custody of their children? (Hollingsworth, 2004) This gives the reader a pithy question that allows them to visualize the direction of the research itself. The research question is quickly followed by characteristics that excite been observed among the participants which define what whitethorn clear a bun in the oven led to a baffle losing custody of her child.The article then provides examples of carriage patterns and socioeconomic factors that whitethorn impact the variables identifyed. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The supposititious framework and research section re-states the purpose of this research and withal provides supportive cultivation as to why this knowledge is main(prenominal) to obtain for the target population mention. The theoretical framework states that the reason used the world Ecology scheme, which fits the problem presented because on that point is bountiful past training available, and biops ychosocial elements provided to be able to test the hypothesis and provide bona fide/measurable information. (Hollingsworth, 2004) Based upon the information in the article the Human Ecology Theory pull up stakes view the buzz off with severe persistent mental illness in her environment, assist in predicting out get ons, and also provide measurable info. The entropy collected go forth enable social workers and mental health workers to connect these women and families to the correct resources so that the go may regain custody and have approaching to the resources that she requires.The variables presented appear to be catch for the problem as it has been defined. The individuals biopsychosocial information is measurable including whether there is a history of substance abuse and interposition for mental illness. The environmental variables are also measurable by gathering selective information related to the individuals neighborhood, child look, poverty conditions, and so cial support. (Hollingsworth, 2004) It is important to mention that each term used in the variables section was further defined and a description was granted as to how the information was considered from these separate groups. The rootage also recognizes that there are factors besides the mothers mental illness that could play a part in her mental functioning. (Hollingsworth, 2004) I nonice that it is important for the actor to cognize these outlying factors that may exercise the selective information that has been collected.The assumptions do in this article intromit more(prenominal) or less bias toward how child safety-related services and the legal scheme will treat a mother that has persistent severe mental illness. It is not stern to understand why this assumption is made and it is reasonable to assume that the legal system and child protective services may assume too much based upon a quick assessment of the mothers mental state. I feel that the discriminatio n based on the research information provided is also related to geographic areas more so than others. If there is a low income area that is lacking access to qualified mental health professionals it would be safe to assume that child protective services would excerpt the children since other resources are not available. The overall design of this article is constructed around quantitative data with the results of the research cosmos constructed around this format the author also provides some supportive evidence through qualitative research. The design is capture to answering the research questions and providing an easy to follow guide for the readers to digest the information.In my prospect the author also did a wakeless job recognizing different threats to the validity of the data that was collected. The author did this by recognizing what those threats were and how it was accounted for in the data that was collected, and what impact it may have had on the results. The sampl e selection was appropriately describe and broken down into measurable categories. The author express Participants were identified from among those enrolled in a National Institute for Mental indisposition funded three- roll out longitudinal canvas of mothers with severe mental illness. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The author further explains that the sample sizing began with 379 women after wind 3 of the debate 322 women remained. (Hollingsworth, 2004) Women were removed from the study throughout the study depending upon different variables listed as disqualifiers, such as a mother losing custody of her child/children for less than three months.Some women chose to remove themselves from the study and others woolly contact with the individuals conducting the study at different times which in turn made the women disqualified. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The process of assembling the data is clearly defined under the method section of the article. The author describes the social organizati on of the questionnaire as a 3 wave longitudinal study. (Hollingsworth, 2004) In my opinion the inconsistencies would come from the participant answering truthfully and systematically within the 3 wave study. In the 3 wave study the data was collected initially through incorporate interview questions, with some open-ended questions used, this is where some of the inconsistencies could be from depending on who was analyzing the answers. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The author stated that a life history calendar was included in the 3rd wave to increase accuracy. (Hollingsworth, 2004) Another consideration would be to note that the participants were paid to participate in the study, but the interview was conducted in the privateness of the participants home. (Hollingsworth, 2004)The interviews were conducted by a trained female interviewer that was racially and ethnically similar to that of the participant. (Hollingsworth, 2004) This is note-worthy because it shows some variables that w ere not stated as having a possible influence on the results of the data collected. I would take into consideration that the interviewer, although professionally trained, may have had biases in favor of the participants that were subconsciously conveyed and could have led the participants to answer the interviewer in a particular manner. The results were able to depict what the variables in the midst of the participants that permanently lost custody of their children and those that did not lose custody of their children. One arouse finding is that women that were not get married were more likely to permanently lose custody of their children. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The hypothesis for this provided by the author is that the married women more than likely had more agile support in the home. (Hollingsworth, 2004)One of the variables listed was the behavior problems from the children of women with persistent mental illness the author notes that in order to determine whether this is th e children just now reacting to the mothers persistent severe mental illness or whether the children have true behavioral issues needs to be studied further. (Hollingsworth, 2004) With that being considered the results found that the childrens behavioral issues had little impact on whether or not the mother lost custody. (Hollingsworth, 2004) The implications recognized are geared toward mental health policy and services the author states that one part of the study that was initially thought of as an individual variable was actually something that could be considered as an environmental factor as well. (Hollingsworth, 2004)The example given was that unmarried women may not be discriminated against due to be unmarried and this being the cause for their custody loss, but may have lost custody due to less resources than someone who has a partner.(Hollingsworth, 2004) The heartbeat noteworthy implication is that individuals with active symptoms of psychosis or depression can present a significant risk to their children, so the children are removed for their own protection and not due to discriminatory factors.(Hollingsworth, 2004)