Napoleon Iii

An Assessment of Whether cat sleep Bonaparte or Louis snooze Had More prodigious Re pisss in France Both short sleep Bonaparte and his nephew Louis pile Bonaparte were crucial prevailrs of France. They ruled with great power and control, they implemented many sweeping reforms and laws that greatly changed the course of cut and European life. pile Bonaparte and Louis nap, also referred to as catnap triad, each directed France through many reforms under their rule.However, the attractor with the more signifi croupet reforms and impact on France was nap one-third. snooze triplet had longer lasting reforms in the likes of rebuilding and modernizing capital of France, constructing the cut railway and mind a immobile French exotic policy that include the pairing of Italy. He also led France through a period of prosperity and industrialization. Louis Napoleon Bonaparte was elected the president of France at age 40, and lie a quite remarkable, and unlikely rise to powe r. Cavendish, 1998, para. 1). Louis Napoleon Bonaparte, named after his uncle Napoleon I, had never held a government position, nor had he even shown any s arrest of political capability, he rose to power solely through far-flung support in France that he was the rightful heir to Napoleon I. (Cavendish, 1998, para. 1,2). In essence, Louis Napoleon rode into control of France on the coattails of his uncle and then he took his uncles rule and furthered the reforms and French power.Louis Napoleon campaigned that he would return France linchpin to the glory that they had one period had under the first Napoleon, and that he, as a ruler, was destined to bring France one time again to the top of Europe. (Cavendish, 1998, para. 5). His strategy successfully swept him into the office of president of Frances Second Republic. The Professional Politicians in France couldnt believe that Louis Napoleon had won, and they were even more shocked when he did away with them.But this didnt come crosswise the ambitious ruler and he quickly took advantage of an economic flag in 1851 and posed himself to be the man that the French needed, not as president but as emperor. (Cavendish, 1998, concluding paragraph). Louis Napoleon Bonaparte can now be c exclusivelyed Napoleon ternary, for in 1852 he declared himself the complete(a) fit for the job to restrict France from collapse and socialism, the Emperor of the second French Empire. (Cavendish, 1998, final paragraph).The citizens of France, so scared of anarchy, and still believing in the Napoleonic Ideals that Napoleon I had left behind, overwhelmingly accepted Louis Napoleon as their brand-new Emperor. The new parliamentary constitution that Napoleon troika mountain up gave him the executive powers it altogetherowed him to nominate the members of the law-making council of state and the senate. (France History-Second French Empire n. d. , para. 1). straight that Louis-Napoleon had full control of France, he could free ly implement actions and reforms that he couldnt have easily achieved as President.One of Napoleons keen interests was in architecture, and it was his desire to make capital of France a new modern city that ultimately turned capital of France from an overcrowding, ancient, disease-ridden cluster of districts into the thriving beauty it is today. (Kirkman, 2007, para. 2). Napoleons interest was the foundation that would produce the plans for a rebuilding of genus Pariss streets, its sewers, and all other aspects of urban planning. It would change the sight of Paris to something unlike anyone had seen. (Kirkman, 2007, para. 2).For hundreds of years, certain areas hadnt been improved, and the daunting task of a vicissitude of Paris was laid on world power Haussmann. Haussmann was a big time planner and was an advocate for beautiful sights, perfect balance and exactness. (Paris pg. 18). Haussmanns desire of linear symmetry surfaced in his first step, which was to put Paris on a gri d. He added streets to Paris that ran east and west, and north and south. These new streets were also wider, allowing for more public safety and safer traffic engineering. (Kirkman, 2007, para. 4).The rapid existence growth mixed with fierce industrialization made some changes to Paris an absolute necessity. An example of this was shown in the growing demand for water clo arrays, which straightway led to the need to funnel the human waste effectively into the sewers. (Kirkman, 2007, para. 6). The doddery ways of dumping the waste in the rivers was rejected, and it was now an objective to keep the clean and dirty water separate. This new practice allowed for clean water, cleaner streets, cleaner people, and a much-improved healthy environment. (Kirkman, 2007, para. , and final paragraph). Under Napoleons constant input and watch Haussmann unified Paris with visual themes and facades that generated all around in the city. The horizontal style of Haussmann can be seen passim Paris . (Kirkman, 2007, para. 7). Perhaps the most unifying aspect that Paris received during its makeover was the emolument of the transportation systems. The railroads underwent massive modernization as train stations were constructed in strategic locations to connect Paris with the rest of France and to the rest of Europe. (Kirkman, 2007, para. 10).These new train stations benefitted agriculture, industrial growth, international markets, employment opportunities, and they represented the overall intent of a more modern city and nation that could be envied from meet countries. (Kirkman, 2007, para. 10). Napoleon III exemplified the prosperity and excellence of the time period by this complete rebuilding of Paris. With the help of grand scale designer Baron Haussmann, Paris slashed boulevards through tangles of slums, began the modern sewer and water systems and set the standard high for the beautiful city that still thrives today. Paris pg. 18) Napoleon III didnt just focus on the im provement and his puzzle out inside of France. Napoleon III headed a strong French foreign policy that occurred in the Second Empire. Particularly important was Napoleon IIIs indispensible role in the Italian unification process. Count Camillo di Cavour was the base minister of the Kingdom of Sardinia, most commonly known as Piedmont, and it was his rotatory ideals and actions that pushed Italian unification forward. But Cavour needed the help of a strong ally in order to achieve is goals this ally came in the form of Napoleon III and France. Oracle ThinkQuest, n. d. , Section III para. 2). Napoleon III always had a specific future planned out for Italy, he even once pushing for his cousin to rule there. (Geddes, 2010, para. 2). Napoleon III attempted to influence these rising movements of unification in Italy following the Revolutions of 1848. whatsoever Napoleons intentions were for Italy, whether it was to use Italy as an asset to serve France in the future or if it was to ge nuinley support the Italian unification, Napoleon saw himself as one that was obligated to be the leader of these free peoples of Europe. (Geddes, 2010, para. ). Without the help of the Frech the States and the support of Napoleon III, Piedmont would have had no chance to unify Italy. Napoleon IIIs influence in this unification process was so extensive he alone put all of Italy together, and kept capital of Italy out of it so as to keep the support of the Catholic church. (Geddes, 2010, final paragraph). There is also an argument that Napoleon I, Napoleon Bonaparte, had the more solid reforms in French history as opposed to Napoleon III. Napoleon I led the French, the the most powerful army in Europe, across the continent in conquerring much of Europe. History, n. d. , opening paragraph). Napoleons reforms include the new Napoleonic Law Code that he implemented in France and in the countries he conquerred, a stronger army, a renewed relationship with the pope, banking and pedago gy improvements, and support for the arts and sciences. (History, n. d. The coup detat of 18 Brumaire section para. 3). But Napoleon Is reforms were self destructed when Napoleon made several backbone mistakes that ultimately doomed his reforms and his plan to establish stability back into the post-revolutionized France. History, n. d. The Coup of 18 Brumaire section para. 3). One miscue included the flop of the Continental system, or Napoleon Bonapartes attempt the ruin the British economy but in backlash it only ruined the French economy. Another mistake was the catastrophic invasion of Russia. The Russian army unmake French supply lines and Napoleon abandoned his army in the Russian winter where they attempted to retreat. Only 100,000 of the original 600,000 French survived. (History, n. d. Napoleons Downfall section para. 1). The French momentum was killed, and so was Napoleon Is popularity. Napoleon I was then forced to abdicate the sens by the combined powers of Britain, P russia, Russia, and Austria and he was exiled to Elba. Those same powers, in order to operate that France wouldnt try to do the same thing again all but eliminated what Napoleon I had long been working for and France was sent back to square one. (History, n. d. Napoleons Downfall section para. 2,3).Therfore, although both Napoleon Bonaparte and Louis Napoleon implemented great reforms in France, Napoleon III had the more significant reforms. Napoleon IIIs reforms had more of a long-lasting effect on France and Europe. Some of these long lasting reforms included the modernization and rebuilding of Paris, improving the French railroads, and influencing the unification of Italy. Thus it is Louis Napoleon Bonaparte that deserves the credit for achieving the more significant reforms in France.