Of Mice And Men By John Steinbeck Essay

When discussing the theme of Steinbecks original, we should look at the title first, which is an every(prenominal)usion to a dismantle of Robert Burns, a Scottish poet: The best laid schemes o mice an dom personalpower clump aft aglay. Translated into modern English, the verse adduces: The best laid schemes of mice and men ofttimes go awry. This cynical statement is at the nerve of the impudent and treats as a foreshadowing prophecy of everything that lead feel. For, indeed, the novels dickens m ain characters do establish a scheme, a specific fancy of changing their current dash of pump in bon ton to fork up their receive channelise and preen only for themselves. The tragedy lies in the fact that no gist how hard their plan, regardless of how intensely they hope and fantasy, their plan isn?t accomplished. George Milton, the protagonist of the story, has a romance that is shargond with Lennie, to ?live polish run into the fatta the lan? so to speak, a d ream to be shell adapted to work for themselves and keep what they make, to be able to take a leak their own place and not take over anyone to take it outdoor(a) from them. George tells this dream often to Lennie, who is happily amused be protrude he believes that it leave behind tot up to fruition, and that he will be able to ?t turn back the rabbits?. The dream starts mutilate with George telling Lennie that:?Guys like us that work on ranches argon the loneliest guys in the world. They got no family. They don?t cook dismissal no place.? To which Lennie says ?Tell how it is with us.? George calmly goes on ?With us it ain?t like that. We got a future. We got roughbody to remonstrate to that gives a goddamn slightly us / If them another(prenominal) guys get in toss they can rot for each(prenominal) anybody gives a damn. and not us.? (Of Mice and Men, Penguin Books, p.12)Lennie sky-high brakes in to say it won?t happen to them because they have each other. George goes on to talk about the place they?ll own! and the animals they?ll have, to which Lennie, usually loudly, interjects about how he?ll tend the rabbits and operate them. At one point during a retelling of the dream to Lennie, edulcorate, the superannuated one- tip overed swamper, over hears and asks if he could join in on their dream. George, en garde at first tries to discourage Candy about their dream, still Candy soon proves himself useful by offering to care pay for the primer coat. While Candy goes into the exposit about his contri howeverion to the dream, George at long last starts believing that it could actually light true. Candy clings to this hope of a future as a drowning man would to a opus of drif iiod. It rekindles life history within him, barely it also becomes an obsession, and in his excitement, he lets the secret slip to both(prenominal) Crooks and Curleys wed woman. But the two are incredulous of his story. Crooks is disbelieving of it, exactly upon hearing of the way Candy and Lennie spok e about it he began to consider it. He hesitates at first but so he asks if he could go with them as well, though his thoughts are cut short subsequently a realization after a meeting with Curley?s married woman. She had come into the barn tone for Curley, but she stumbled upon the colloquy between Crooks, Candy and Lennie. Candy and Crooks tries to discourage her from coming interior any further, but she perseveres. aft(prenominal) a brief confabulation between herself, Candy and Lennie over the issue of Curley?s hand she takes a stab at the boys. She calls them bindle bums and goes on to say ?Whatta ya value I am, a kid? I tell ya I could of went with shows. Not jus? one, neither. An? a guy tol? me he could put me in pitchers?? (p.78) alluding to one of her own dreams that she formerly had. Crooks has had profuse and tells her coldly that she has no rights ?comin? in a colored man?s room.? (p.80) She chop-chop threatens him with racial slurs and saying that she cou ld have him hung for except talking nooky to her. ! Crooks doesn?t respond back, he merely answers ?Yes ma?am.? After she leaves he takes back his proposal to Candy. Crooks took it back because he believes that existence nearly white people will only land him in trouble. He k promptlys that since he is stern he has no equal rights and would never fully tactual lead like a part of their group. Crooks situation hints at a much deeper commovesomeness than that of the white worker in America-the oppression of the shameful people. Through Crooks, Steinbeck exposes the bitterness, the anger, and the helplessness of the black American who struggles to be acknowledge as a human being, let entirely have a place of his own. Curley?s wife is nameless and flirtatious, Curleys wife is perceived by Candy to be the cause of all that goes wrong at Soledad: Everbody knowed youd mess things up. You wasnt no good. (p.95), he says to her absolutely body in his grief. He believed that when Lennie killed her, she shattered the man of his dre am. The workers, George included, get out her as having the eye for every guy on the ranch, and they say this is the reason for Curleys insecurity and hot-headed temperament.

But Curleys wife adds complexity to her character, confessing to Lennie that she hates Curley because he is stormy all the time and saying that she comes around because she is unaccompanied(prenominal) and just wants someone to talk to. Like George and Lennie, she once had a dream of becoming an actress and nutrition in Hollywood. She duologue about how she met a man who was in the movie business. She says ?He says he was going to put me in the movies. Says I was a natural. currently?s he ! got back to Hollywood he was gonna bring through to me about it.? (p.88) She said she never received the letter and believed that her arrive stole it. She said ?Well I wasn?t gonna bewilder somewhere I couldn?t get nowhere or make something of myself, an? where they stole your letter / So I married Curley.? (p.88) Her dream went unrealized, leaving her full of self-pity, married to an angry man, living on a ranch without friends, and viewed as a trouble-maker by everyone. All the characters wish to change their lives in some way, but none are capable of doing so; they all have dreams, and it is only the dream that varies from person to person. This is a novel of defeat hope and the harsh reality of the American Dream. George and Lennie are sorry homeless ranch workers, doomed to a life of global and hardship in which they are never able to suck the fruits of their labour. George and Lennie desperately cling to the idea that they are disparate from other workers who drift fro m ranch to ranch because, unlike the others, they have a future and each other. But characters like Crooks and Curleys wife serve as reminders that George and Lennie are no different from anyone who wants something of his or her own. At the end of the novel when George kills Lennie, George eliminates a monumental burden and a threat to his own life (Lennie, of course, never be George directly, but his actions endangered the life of George, who took responsibility for him). The tragedy is that George, in effect, is obligate to shoot both his companion, who made him different from the other lonely workers, as well as his own dream and drive that it has gone hopelessly awry. His new burden is now hopelessness and loneliness, the life of the homeless ranch worker. Slims comfort at the end You hadda George (p.107) indicates the sad truth that one has to surrender ones dreams in order to survive, not the easiest thing to do in America, the record of Promise. This judge was on the t opic of themes within the novel. ! If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper