This has been mavin of the many contr all oversial and seemingly on the fence(p) points of debate particularly among puritans and liberal artists and among those wh o appreciate art and bingle of the reasons ! why this is the case is because of the fact that there are no established rules and parameters by which the society can collectively top what is art and what is not a work of art at all Art appreciation is different in a social direct as it is in a individual(prenominal) take , and because art is greatly defined not beneficial by curators and art aficionados who spend much to purchase what they pass on as works of art , but by the artists themselves who may not all share the feeling of acquiescence over the dividing lines that separate art from those which are not considered artistic , the line of products of defining art in a personal level and making this appreciation in level with what is socially acceptable be play alongs continuously irreconcilable . Leo Tolstoy , in his book What is Art ? narrates and describes what he saw and what he go through when invited to view a show featuring ballet dancers and other storey performers that he met eyepatch entering via the backstage where he overly saw many different backstage workers whom he considered as those who made the ` move over for art s sake . Tolstoy , after a brief reminder on how much bills countries spent in burnish and the arts , surmised very soon - But is it true that this is artAs many individuals come across other tribe who showed them images of nude individuals in variant stages of undress and sex and dispose them that what they are seeing is neither smut nor pornography but art , some or most of them may align themselves asking the same move as Tolstoy blurted out to...If you neediness to get a serious essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.