Blood Sports (Debate) Essay

Blood sports should non be banned whatever problems there atomic number 18 with the sport put up be fixed with reforms. The World Health memorial tablet has c totallyed for tighter regulation, including Simple rules, such as requiring medical clearance, national passports to pr tear downt players from combat under more than than angiotensin converting enzyme name, restricting holds for fixed periods after knockouts, requiring that ringside seat physicians be paid by the state and non the promoter, and making incontestable that the players ar aware of the potential long-term consequence of blood sports, whitethorn help protect them to some degree.The Australian Medical Association additionally recommends that media coverage should be subject to control codes similar to those which apply to video recording screening of fury. Finally, the World Medical Association suggests that all matches should deem a ring physician authorized to stop the fight at whatever measure. I t has been reported that no safety regulations would be effective if head blows last out however such authors incorrectly apportion blame on boxing for a group of maladys k straightwayn as Parkinsons syndrome.Blood sports can result in chronic traumatic neurological conditions if fighters are not well matched, and fight without regulations in regard to their exposure. Boxing cannot cause Parkinsons disease or other conditions such as Alzheimers disease as those are genetic conditions so to include them together as one set of conditions is incorrect and misleading. About 80% of deaths are ca employ by head, brain, and neck injuries, so the removal of the head as a rack up region may make a huge difference to the fault outcomes for this sport.However it would also change the very nature of the sport and may mean people wont participate in it. Ultimately, governments should do what they can to make blood sports as safe as possible, without losing the event of the sport or bann ing it entirely. - (Banning blood sports would force people to seam their aggression into more harmful, ruffianly activities) There is no conclusive scientific evidence linking join ond contact sport participation with being more violent in social settings.Such statements make it sound as thought we would have not military unit in society if all contact sport was removed and we all know that is untrue. Blood sports isnt virtually violent aggression, it is about controlled aggression this is very different to violent behaviors. In a report on violent sports in schools, conducted by the Lance Armstrong Foundation, a martial-arts instructor explained, Contact and combat sports allow students to make love with their aggression in a safe environment, rather than in the scene of the classroom or school hallway.This type of outlet is not still important for youth, but for adults as well. Jason Brick said, Positive Views on Violence In Sports, Live strong, January 7, 2011, accesse d July 13, 2011, With /proposition (The Effect of blood sports on the viewers) Blood Sports have been around for decades. Viewing furiousness generally triggers or serves in the increase of aggression of an individual. Sports such as wrestling (smack down) and Ultimate Fighter competition (UFC) are bloody sports and have aboutly negative effects on those who watch them.The objective of these two sports is to beat an individual into unconsciousness, make them beleaguer out by inflicting pang, if none of these is accomplished within a time frame, the match is to be stopped and the judges decide who wins. Many children, teenagers, and even adults tend to try and imitate a knock out or combos that were seen performed at one of these fights onto an individual in an uncontrolled environment whether it is their sibling, friend, coworker, or a stranger for different reasons that includes but is not limited to a misunderstanding or horse playing.Watching this sport leaves the viewer psy chologically aggressive. For example, if someone watches a match and gets into a fight with another somebody later on, that person is more likely to use a technique he saw during the fight, and since there is no referee to stop the fight in case of suffocation or tap-out, the victim is more likely to bleed, pass out or even dies. During the 1980s, two men were in a bar discussing the Marvin Haggler and Sugar Ray Leonard fight that had occurred several long time before, and in the process on trying to show exactly how one of the cowhand landed, both men went outside, drawing a crowd with them.The demo turned tragic when one of the men landed a punch to the jaw of the other, and such was the power of the blow, that the victim fell, hit his head on the pavement and started to bleed, and had to be buried a few weeks later. Seeing and permitting violence to be seen makes it seem normal and legal when in fact it is not normal and it is horrible, but here is where lies another problem which is called desensitization.Many days ago when a horrible scene was about to be portray on your television set, there would first appear a windowpane saying the images that you are about to see might injure the predisposition of certain people or words to that effect. Well, have you noticed that now they no longer even bother showing that little window? Its as if the media know that human kind are used to everything by now. That nothing is going to affect them that much. So what does this show?It shows that us human beings are getting desensitized to everything and when that happens it also means that we dont get so emotional about anything anymore and so hence dont fight any more either in order to strive for a change. We have all come to a point where nothing moves us that much anymore. (Pain and Injury as the value of blood sports) Many people think about sports in a paradoxical way They accept violence in sports, but the injuries caused by that violence make them unea sy.They seem to want violence without consequences like the ?ctionalized violence they see in the media and video games in which characters engage in viciousness without being heartrendingly or permanently injured. However, blood sports are authoritative, and it causes tangible pain, wound, disability, and even death (Dater, 2005 Farber, 2004 Leahy, 2008 Rice, 2005 Smith, 2005b Young, 2004a). Ron Rice, an NFL player whose career ended when he tackled an opponent, discusses the real consequences of blood sports. The brutal body contact of the tackle left him temporarily paralyzed and permanently disabled. He remembers that before I hit the ground, I knew my career was over. . . . My body froze.I was like a tree that had been bed down, teetering, then crashing, unable to break my fall. Research on pain and injury among athletes helps us understand that blood sports have real consequences. Studies indicate that victor sports involving brutal body contact and borderline violence are among the most dangerous workplaces in the occupational world. The same could be said about high-pro? le power and performance intercollegiate sports in which 80 pct of male and female athletes sustain at least one serious injury while playing their sports and nearly 70 percent are disabled for two or more weeks.Research shows a penny-pinching connection between dominant ideas about maleness and the high graze of injuries in many sports. Ironically, some power and performance sports are unionised so that players feel that their manhood is up for grabs. Men who de? ne masculinity in terms of physically dominating others often use violence in sports as an expression of this code of manhood. Until they critically examine issues related to gender and the organization of their sports, they will mistakenly de? ne violence as a source of rewards rather than a source of chronic pain and disabilities that constrain and threaten their lives.