Social Theories on Deviance: Essay

The Functionalist Theory\n\nThe functionalist surmise was ground on the work of Durkheim, Erikson and Merton and what makes the functionalist disparate from other theories is that it sees crime and divergence in a positive degree light. The functionalists consider deviance a normal part of tone and that it has negative and positive effects. They gestate that deviance assists tidy sum in defining the limits of acceptable neighborly standards and. Durkheim coined a term anomie which means sort of destabilized when soul behavior cannot be controlled by society. (Schaefer 166)\n\nConflict Theory\n\nThe difference theorys perspective on deviance and crime is quite antithetical from the view adopted by the functionalists. Deviance is defined as being caused due to the interlocking between polar roles of different members of the society. In addition the laws enacted be also there to comfort the powerful people and restrict them on top. (Schaefer 169) The conflict theor y also assumes that laws argon make so that some acts ar considered acceptable while others be not as they are perpetuated by the rich and powerful. For case Marijuana is illegal; however, Cigarettes which are very harmful are legal because big corporations divvy up them. (Schaefer 170)\n\nThe Interactionalist Theory\n\nThe Interactionalist approach has more to do with the interrelationships between people and the Interactionalist contend that the social norms and frugal conditions which force a person to resort to deviant behaviors. (Schaefer 168)The deform in this theory is on the socially formed excuses and meanings which prevail to deviant behavior or according to the labeling theory because of a certain behavior of a group or various(prenominal) they are labeled deviant. (Schaefer 169)