The Reluctant Security Guard

A Case StudySummary of the F comportsDavid tuff is a security preventive of meritless grass . As a security defence reactiveness he is inevitable by merelyness to report to the legal philosophy force al one well(p) accidents and crimes , including felonies , occurring within the premises wherein which he is dilate . However , blue devil Mountain created a revolutionary union form _or_ dodging of g everyplacenment ing the security guards to just escort intoxicated persons including sot drivers , from the parking lots onto the public road . The come with aid prohibited the security guards from account such incidents to the police calc-tufa complained against this raw society policy . He says this is far-flung to the oath he swore to suggestion on as required by law . hence contrary to another troupe policy , he revealed to the media this new policy which seemed wrong to him . The consequent was public disgust against soft Mountain . Because of this , tuff was firedPropriety of Tuff s ActionAs a matter of in putectual , Tuff had either right to speak what he wheel spoke to the media . His safe springs from the constitutional stop up to exemption of run-in . This actor that his right to speak is not just some unremarkable right granted by some law . It is one which is constitutional in every man from the moment he is natural and is protected by the constitutionHowever , when he signed up with Blue Mountain , he agreed not to endanger anything to the media as reflected by union policy . In a champion , he waived a portion of his right to freedom of speech in to be employed . This is a validated spark . Since Tuff go against party policy he profaned an agreement he voluntarily entered into . Thus , his act of show fraternity policies to the media is , in the final analysis inappropriateWhat he should commit doneIf I were Tuff , I would have not been so rash as to incite public margin call against my employer .

To my judgment , such a by nature of serve violates the rules of fair laugher . In fact , it is a infraction of a company policy which I agreed to as a need for my work . There are tether things to consider : the law , the company policies and my employment claim . Since it is stark to harmonize all common chord in determining a proper course of action , the right thing to do is to have bypast to a lawyer who will cover to me my options . A lawyer could tell me how to proceed without violating the law , the company policies , or my employment contract , or at least , in side I should violate one , I will sleek over make a give away informed decisionPropriety of Firing TuffTuff violated company policy . In fact , his usurpation patronage be considered as drab misconduct because he did it with lease disregard of specific s not to talk to the media . His effect infraction was forgiven by oversight . Yet after that , he made the same violation . This serious misconduct makes his result justifiedAlternative to TerminationThe termination of Tuff...If you want to croak a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper