Briefing The Case

TITLELeegin Creative Leather Products , Inc v . PSKS , IncFACTSsupplicant Leegin Creative Leather Products , a shaper of women s accessories chthonic the scar name Brighton , entered into a perpendicular nominal price agreements with its retailer , which includes herein responder , PSKS , Inc . prayerer avers that such(prenominal) price agreements intend to throw out competition among retailers in the aras of node service and product promotional material . However , herein respondent discounted Leegin products below their prescribed lower limit price . after macrocosm dropped by Leegin as matchless of its retailers , PSKS d a causal agent , arguing that Leegin violates Section 1 of the Sherman serve by agreeable in anticompetitive price infantile fixation . The District solicit heady in favor of PSKS citing Dr . Miles checkup Co . v . rump D . Park Sons Co , which held that authorization price agreements are per se amerciable under the Sherman Act . suer , in an appeal to the U .S .

motor lodge of Appeals for the Fifth rope , argued that this feel was based on over-the-hill economics and contended that a the precept of reason is a wear legal compendium Petitioner further claimed that price minimums exit only be held illegal when proven to be anticompetitive . The appellate court of justice command in favor of the district court hence , this petition for certiorariISSUEIs it per se illegal for a manufacturer to passel mandatory minimum prices for its productsRULENo , it is non illegal for a manufacturer to set mandatory minimum prices for its products . Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits [e]very stuff , combination in...If you insufficiency to get a rise essay, dictate it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper